Search Results
No results found
About 177.1997
- Title: 177.1997
- Author(s): Baron Ferdinand de Rothschild
- Date of creation: 1897
- Extent:
- Material:
- Physical Location:
Annotations
Transcript
now feel certain of is that it was either the work of or was
econnived at by some of the servants . Of these the French maid
7
ip2LCavea anys as they aione
haa been eft at home and where they had
sed. We had a French butler at the time and eventually
and the coupiesethen disappeared.
e married the French maid
aiporately planned, ,iatewadsecarried) outsin-the) absencesof-the
fs a i he — ee ee rl v —< 3 . urea bi Pe nS
lid as wasmproved:by thecdate on-which the house was broken
into, land byetheerandang of ;thevwkeyson theatervrace and: fi the
} = : « 17 +1 »lAa Thaw oh i hs > han aRARlM)Y?) nA SG
laces andefansi2erthe feids. [They might have had accomplices
it it is hard to imagine how two foreigners could have found
Solniaxustrange «(town erehaving i found | them: ,ritais
Qauvyrv
difficult to think how they could have avoided sooner or later
betraying themselves or their principals.
Then there was Anna. It transpired later on that our old
lish nurse Mrs Henderson , who had been promoted to
place of housekeeper, had been persuaded by Anna to entertain
the servants and their friends at a supper party on
of the burglary ,; and that: Anna had been very much excited dur-
lIngpabme P@ast whoShe hadyavioverior Leng stanging: ,.aupr:
workman ,and I think I j~though. I am not. quite
- Q 7 CP on re ae " ae = sat £ + 1 ey awt.«tr \ a 1} +
COPLaiInyvor iene facts Bhavehe WaS/nOb Oletnenpareys Anna 5 Lt
Wlll be recalled was strangely affected on the day after the
burglary and was opposed to the inspection of the house which
4 She neither recognised the key we
v
FH
r :.
ie)
ol
5
n
~
mM
ct
ia)
Oo
Oo
RK
|
3
0
£
a)
=
st
3
had found on the terrace , nor did she even hint at the desira-
. va
bility of ascertaining whether the jewels were, safe after the